In their own words:
Homosexual activists reveal their real agenda.
claim they want the "right" to get married and live normal lives just
like heterosexual married couples.
The truth is, however, that the drive to gain legalization of so-called
"gay" or "same-sex" marriage is part of a larger sexual
agenda. Homosexual activists are now beginning to openly admit that they don't
want to marry just to have a normal home life. They want same-sex marriage
as a way of destroying the concept of marriage altogether-and of introducing
polygamy and polyamory (group sex) as
They are finally admitting what the Traditional Values Coalition (TVC) has been
saying for years: Their ultimate goal is to abolish all prohibitions against
sex with multiple partners.
WHAT ARE THEY SAYING? ...
Chris Crain, the editor of the Washington
Blade has stated that all homosexual activists should fight for the
legalization of same-sex marriage as a way of gaining passage of federal
anti-discrimination laws that will provide homosexuals with federal
protection for their chosen lifestyle.
Crain writes: "...any leader of any gay rights organization who is
not prepared to throw the bulk of their efforts right now into the fight
for marriage is squandering resources and doesn't deserve the position."
(Washington Blade, August, 2003).
Michelangelo Signorile, writing in Out!magazine, has stated that homosexuals should, "...fight
for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine
the institution of marriage completely … To debunk a myth and radically
alter an archaic institution. … The most subversive action lesbians and
gays can undertake-and one that would perhaps benefit all of society-is to
transform the notion of 'family' altogether." (Out! magazine,
Andrew Sullivan, a homosexual activist writing
in his book, Virtually Normal, says that once same-sex marriage is
legalized, heterosexuals will have to develop a greater "understanding
of the need for extramarital outlets between two men than between a man
and a woman." He notes: "The truth is, homosexuals are
not entirely normal; and to flatten their varied and complicated lives
into a single, moralistic model is to miss what is essential and
exhilarating about their otherness." (Sullivan, Virtually Normal,
Paula Ettelbrick, a law professor and homosexual
activist has said: "Being queer is more than setting up house,
sleeping with a person of the same gender, and seeking state approval for
doing so. … Being queer means pushing the parameters of sex, sexuality,
and family; and in the process, transforming the very fabric of society. …
We must keep our eyes on the goals of providing true alternatives to
marriage and of radically reordering society's view of reality."
(partially quoted in "Beyond Gay Marriage," Stanley Kurtz, The
Weekly Standard, August 4, 2003)
Evan Wolfson has stated: "Isn't
having the law pretend that there is only one family model that works (let
alone exists) a lie? … marriage is not just about
procreation-indeed is not necessarily about procreation at all. "(quoted
in "What Marriage Is For," by Maggie Gallagher, The Weekly
Standard, August 11, 2003)
Mitchel Raphael, editor of the Canadian
homosexual magazine Fab, says: "Ambiguity
is a good word for the feeling among gays about marriage. I'd be for
marriage if I thought gay people would challenge and change the
institution and not buy into the traditional meaning of 'till death do us
part' and monogamy forever. We should be Oscar Wildes
and not like everyone else watching the play." (quoted in
"Now Free To Marry, Canada's Gays Say, 'Do I?'" by
Clifford Krauss, The New York Times, August 31,
1972 Gay Rights Platform Demands: "Repeal of all
legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering
into a marriage unit…" [Emphasis added.]
Sign/Distribute the petition
to keep Traditional Marriage in the U.S.A.